Showing posts with label certification. Show all posts
Showing posts with label certification. Show all posts

Sunday, 25 November 2012

FOOD SERVICE CERTIFICATION-A VOLUNTARY INITIATIVE

There are two ways to make food industry behave in a style that will ensure safety and well being of consumers. One is to impose through harsh measures safety standards by putting in place well reasoned and technically feasible measures which all manufacturers are bound to abide by. Another option is to persuade the industry to exercise voluntary restraints on practices that can adversely impinge on consumer health. In most Western countries a combination of the above two approaches is in vogue. However past experiences show that voluntary restraint based model guidelines do not work very satisfactorily with some segment of the industry not following the guidelines and progress is relatively slow. Many impartial observers believe that the self constraint mode can be made more effective if appropriate incentives are provided to the industry for bettering their performance. One such incentive involves providing recognition of good performers through friendly competition which hopefully will motivate others to further their efforts to match the leaders. Here is an example of such a system that seems to be working in California, USA.

"Few things can spoil an evening like finding a hair in your pasta, a roach swimming around in your soup or that awful feeling in your gut when you realize something was wrong with the pork chops you just ate. On Tuesday, the Tulane County Board of Supervisors will honor more than 90 restaurants and other food vendors that have done better jobs than most of ensuring their food is stored, handled and prepared in ways that meet state health and safety standards. All will receive Excellence in Food Safety Awards as part of a program started in 2010 by the California Restaurant Association's Central Valley Chapter. The awards go to food businesses that score 95 percent or higher on at least three consecutive county food business health inspections. The winners range from restaurants to markets to a hotel".

Restaurants, besides providing nice tasting food preparations, offer a change for millions of people from their routine chores and the ambiance that exists in many eating establishments is stimulating and relaxing. Eating out is a phenomenon that is becoming an integral part of the modern life and in many countries such foods make up as much as 15-25% of the food consumed. If this trend is recognized, food safety authorities will have to increase vigilance to safeguard the health of the consumers through frequent inspections and deterrent action to ensure that preparations are made under strict hygienic and sanitary conditions. But in a country like India it is easier said than done as the infrastructure and personnel for inspection of facilities and testing restaurant foods are grossly inadequate. A voluntary scheme by the catering industry association in each area to promote safety of the foods by  its members through a systematic inspection and grading has the potential to augment the efforts of mandated authorities. Government must encourage such voluntary efforts through helping the association by providing grants for setting up facilities for simple testing and training for frequent assessment of the the catering environment. It should even be possible to institute a program for the customers to express their opinion about the cleanliness and other safety parameters through a well structured system which can help the association to factor them into eventual grading or awarding marks on a sound measuring scale. 

V.H.POTTY
http://vhpotty.blogspot.com/
http://foodtechupdates.blogspot.com

Sunday, 11 November 2012

DRINKING WATER-DOES IT COME UNDER FOOD CATEGORY?

Can drinking water be considered a food? Do the FSSAI provisions apply to this material? A section of the packaged drinking water manufacturing community seems to be holding the view that no safety authority restraints can apply to them and they have the freedom to put any muck in the market without being questioned! Ii is interesting to note that more than two thirds of the water processing units in the state of Karnataka have no ISI certification from Bureau of Indian Standards (BSI) because of their perceived feeling that it was not mandatory. While the state administration was not able to bring to books these delinquents, it was left to the judiciary to compel them to seek the quality certification from BIS without which consumer safety is compromised. Here is a take on this consumer protection ruling from Karnataka High Court for which people of the state should be grateful.

'Holding that packaged drinking water comes within the purview of Food Safety and Standard Act, 2006, the Karnataka High Court on Friday said that certification from the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) is mandatory for packaged drinking water. The court also directed the State government to take action to prohibit and prevent the manufacture and sale of packaged drinking water without BIS certification. A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Vikramajit Sen and Justice Aravind Kumar passed the order while disposing of a public interest litigation (PIL) petition by Lochamesh B. Hugar of Hubli complaining inaction by the authorities against manufacturers of packaged drinking water operating without BIS certification, and a batch of petitions filed by the manufacturers claiming that certification from BIS was not necessary. The Bench also directed the authorities to take action against the manufacturers if they found them operating without certification from BIS. However, noticing that there are 564 packaged drinking water manufacturing units without BIS certification as against 224 with BIS certification across the State, the court has given an opportunity for those operating without BIS certification to apply for certification. The Bench said that all manufacturers will have to submit applications for BIS certification in the prescribed format within 15 days. It directed the authorities concerned, including the BIS, to process the application within three months and notify the deficiencies, if any, in these units. The Bench said that entire exercise will have to be completed within four months. Meanwhile, the court has given liberty to the authorities to initiate action against those manufacturers who fail to adhere to the directions and comply with conditions for manufacturing packaged drinking water".

While on paper, products with ISI mark give some confidence to the consumer regarding their quality and safety, in practice BIS is not an organization best known for its efficiency. It is common to see many products in the market place with ISI markings either spurious or sub-standard as this quality certification  agency has neither the required personnel nor the infrastructure to implement their standards. Some times it is not clear why there should be a separate certification requirement for only water which after all is a part and parcel of the food system and hence the onus of ensuring safety of drinking water must be on FSSAI which has the wherewithal to prosecute offenders more efficiently than a toothless agency like BIS. Those who went to court questioning the operation of BIS in drinking water quality management, has a valid point in that FSSAI already covers water also and ISI certification is therefore redundant. Same is true with others like AGMARK also and it is time that country's food quality and safety enforcement agencies are integrated leaving the entire function to a single agency.

V.H.POTTY
http://vhpotty.blogspot.com/
http://foodtechupdates.blogspot.com